Saturday, April 10, 2010

WHAT ARE THEY DOING?

Yesterday, I sat in traffic for more than an hour and a half coming home from my Philadelphia office (normally a 20 minute trip). Ultimately, the cause turned out to be road construction in town, on the river drives, on the expressway . . .

Now, I know we need to repair our roads and other infrastructure, and that while many companies try to keep these repairs to off-hours, it cannot always be done that way. My question is more fundamental; when lanes of traffic are blocked off and several lanes funneled into a “cattle chute,” and it has been going on in the same stretch of roadway (about a 50 meter stretch) for the last year, with no progress noted, WHAT ARE THEY DOING?!

The only explanation I can think of is an open ended contract in which the company is paid for time and materials no matter how long they take. With today’s economy, they simply take years to accomplish what could be done in days or weeks.

It’s time to end the anger, frustration, and overpayments. Either these companies can complete their repairs on time and within budget, or we need to find ones who can. Mr. Mayor, Governor, you’re spending our money and wasting our time every day. If you cannot get these things completed, please turn the job over to someone who can, or we’ll have to have the discussion again during each election cycle.

Wednesday, April 07, 2010

WHO KILLED LETHENIA PETTY?

In February 2005, Lathenia Petty went to her family physician (which insurance companies now call a “Primary Care Physician” or “PCP”) because of a lump she found in her breast. She was immediately sent to Pottstown Memorial Hospital for an ultrasound to evaluate it. The ultrasound reported that the mass was suspicious for cancer, and recommended a biopsy and here, the story becomes an example of Murphy’s Law.

The Imaging Department at the hospital faxed the report to an outdated telephone number that they believed belonged to Ms. Petty’s PCP. Naturally, since the number was wrong, her PCP never received the report and, apparently no paper copy was mailed out; presumably in an effort to save money for the hospital by being “paperless.” As is usual, a note was placed into Ms. Petty’s chart to follow up on the test results, but apparently became loss in the morass of paper that most patient charts have become; being stuffed with two inches of referral forms from HMO’s, and a dozen other irrelevant document types that clutter the chart and squeeze the real clinical notes out.

During the next several months, nothing was followed up because her PCP didn’t remember, and she never asked about it despite the lump growing larger. Not until the following December, when she finally noted that the lump was still there, was she “referred” to a surgeon for biopsy, and then she was left to find a surgeon who accepted her insurance, on her own. Most likely, though, she was handed the insurance company list of surgeons, which is usually so out of date that hours can be spent finding one who still accepts a particular insurance, and told to keep calling surgeons on the list until she found one her insurance would pay for because neither physicians nor their staff spend hours doing this for ten patients each day, and still care for the remaining patients.

Ultimately, because of the delay in diagnosis and treatment, Lathenia Petty died. A lawsuit (with the trial beginning today) was filed which asks the question – “who is to blame for her death?” Unfortunately, the answer is everyone and no one. At each step in the process, errors and omissions were made. Her PCP should have had a system in place to follow up on reports that have not been received for more than a week or so after a test was done, and the notes should have flagged the issue for future visits. The Imaging department should have made sure its fax numbers were accurate, mailed paper copies of reports as a follow-up to the faxed reports, and followed up on “positive” reports. The insurance companies should maintain accurate and up-to-date lists of the physicians they have on their panels . . . I could go on endlessly, but there is one person not charged with negligence in the lawsuit that had the greatest responsibility, and did not accept it – Lathenia Petty, herself.

Mistakes were made at every turn in a health care system that everyone acknowledges is not merely broken, but shattered. When bad things happen, though, we always look for others to blame. Had Ms. Petty reminded her PCP at the next visit that her lump was still present (or merely demanded her test results), action would have been taken then, and her death, possibly, avoided. Had she called her PCP during the ensuing months to report the “lump” growing or remaining (or simply reported it at each visit), action would have followed and her death possibly avoided. The answer here is both simple and profound. While mistakes were made by others, the most serious mistake, and the one most responsible for her death was the one she made in failing to accept responsibility for her own life. When we abdicate that authority to others, we invite disaster regardless of Electronic Medical Records, and so the most negligent person in the mix was Ms. Petty; a fatal victim of her own failures.

Monday, April 05, 2010

A TOUCH OF SANITY!

It isn’t often, lately, that I get to praise something that a government does, but today is an exception. Seth Williams, Philadelphia’s new District Attorney announced, after meeting with state Supreme Court, Chief Justice Ronald D. Castille and Justice Seamus P. McCaffery that the city is going to change possession of less than 30gm of Marijuana into a “Summary Offence” from a misdemeanor. That means that if arrested with less than about an ounce of marijuana, you will be fined, but you will not face prison or a criminal record.

Now, let’s be clear. It would be wonderful if no one ever felt the need to use mind altering substances like alcohol and other drugs, and therefore never used anything. Unfortunately neither the world in general, nor humans are built that way. Not only have people used such substances since pre-history, but repeated attempts at criminalization have all led to more pain and suffering, as well as doing more harm to society than the substances themselves.

We tried criminalization of alcohol (remember “Prohibition?”), and all it led to was poisonous “bathtub gin” and the rise ofOrganized Crime.” So, today, all criminalization of other drugs has led to is more of our population behind bars than any other industrialized nation, including China, a huge (tax free) revenue stream for Organized Crime, and more than 50% of all violent crimes (most committed by dealers, not users).

Additionally, while most of these arrests have been for possession of marijuana, it is the one drug that has never killed anyone, making it safer than both alcohol and nearly every pharmaceutical on the market. Why is it still illegal when most thinking, rational people agree that it shouldn’t be? I could argue that it is the “liquor lobby,” the “Wingnuts,” or any other group that seems to want everyone to do things their way. I will argue, instead, for legalization.

What would legalization of marijuana bring? It would probably increase the number of users, just as opponents argue, but it would also substantially decrease our prison population, remove the disparate impact of arrests falling largely upon our African American population, increase revenues for both the city, state and federal governments (which they can all use about now), and increase the respect of the average citizen for the Law since they would no longer be required to flout such a stupid and anachronistic one as the criminalization of possession of dried plant leaves.

Congratulations to the City of Philadelphia for taking the first step! Now, go the rest of the way and we can concentrate on arresting real criminals and terrorists and make our city, state and nation safer.